Archive for March 13th, 2008

Waiting on FISA Vote

After a lengthy debate on the budget, the House has moved on to debating FISA, but have not voted yet.

The Decider began the day properly on the South Lawn and delivered his standard dose of fear-mongering before any FISA-related activity. The President graciously and with all due respect, informed the People that House leaders dumped the bill he keeps demanding and instead, “they introduced a partisan bill that would undermine America’s security.”

When asked about the President’s kind and noble accusations, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi responded with a Pinocchio lesson.

Q: “Are you saying the President is lying?”

A: Speaker Pelosi: “That’s the same question I got in 2001 when they asked me when I said ‘the intelligence on Iraq does not support the threat, of an imminent threat, to our country’ that the Administration is contending…I said then, and I say now, I am stating a fact. The President is wrong and he knows it.”

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn gave the President these little nuggets of truth and wisdom.

Hoyer:

The White House insistence that Congress provide telecommunications companies that participated in the President’s surveillance program with blanket immunity is neither justified nor in keeping with our nation’s legal tradition. In essence, the President is asking Congress to immunize companies for their conduct – despite the fact that Congress is not sure what conduct it would be immunizing, and despite the fact that serious questions have been raised about the legality of the surveillance program. Congress owes the American people more than blind obeisance to the Executive Branch.

Clyburn:

The absurd and outrageous allegations made by President Bush this morning that FISA legislation being considered in the House would make America less safe are false and misleading.

The FISA legislation being debated in the House this week would upgrade our intelligence surveillance capabilities while at the same time protecting core constitutional freedoms that all Americans value and cherish….I encourage the President to stop the scare tactics and work with Congress on legislation that improves our national security and moves our country in a New Direction.

Just before submitting this post, their is some argument debate between Democratic Representatives and House Minority Whip Roy Blunt over going into an unplanned secret session for further debate. Some of the Dems are questioning the intent and purpose of the secret session — they clearly think someone is trying to pull a fast one over them. That’s all I know at this point. Who know what kind of hi jinks may be occurring, or maybe its legit???

Oh boy. More debates

Oh god, tell me it isn’t so. More debates.

Hillary wanted more debates and Obama agreed.

Debate No. 1,203,489 will be held in Philly on April 16, and will be hosted by ABC.

Debate No. 1,203,450 will be held in NC (City TBD) on April 19, sponsered by CBS. And moderated by….oh the pain, the pain….Katie Couric.

What could they possibly achieve in two more debates? I mean,…what can the strategy possibly be? More lies? Weren’t enough lies generated in the last debate and all swiftly and embarrassingly debunked later?

I almost forgot the most important issue…who will get the first question of the debate? Valium!!!

Olbermann hits Clinton, Ferraro with special comment

Over the past several weeks I have watched Keith Olbermann wince and exercise visible restraint over Hillary Clinton’s disgraceful campaign. I knew if Clinton continued demonizing Obama and destroying the Democratic party (much less herself, as if she even cared about that), it would present a growing challenge to Olbermann’s integrity and credibility. To not address the shameful and disgusting attacks on Obama by Clinton and her Racist-in-Chief, Ferraro, would violate the principles he has famously stood for. Last night, Olbermann demonstrated his dedication to speaking out against those who are wrong, blasting Clinton and Ferraro.

Make no mistake, Keith dutifully and appropriately criticized the Slime-Duo in his characteristic style, but he was a bit reserved, which is OK. It was as if he was telling Ferraro, and primarily Clinton, it was his first warning. But beware…continue their reprehensible behavior and the next special comment would be more in keeping with the tongue-lashings given Bush and Cheney.

Watch the video.



Transcript available here.