Clinton must provide empirical evidence to support her ‘Obama can’t win’ claims
ABC’s George Stephanopoulos reports Hillary Clinton strong-armed Gov. Bill Richardson before he endorsed Barack Obama. She "told him flatly, ‘He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win.’ " Indeed, her statements are firmly grounded in the alethic and declarative moods. If her case is that overwhelmingly bullet-proof, then I want to know, specifically and precisely, what quantitative and irrefutable empirical evidence Clinton has to support her profundity.
If she indeed possesses such damnable evidence, it is incumbent upon her to provide the American people with that information. We have the right to know the unequivocal facts if they are so compelling. The same would apply for Sen. Obama if he were to make similar statements, ad nauseam.
Dispense with the 3:00 A.M. ads that are only suitable for marketing NyQuil, and simply tell Americans the truth. If it is as bad as she presents to Gov. Richardson and other superdelegates, then would her not informing the public be a great disservice to the country?
We’re adults. We can handle the truth. But, can Clinton tell it?
0 Responses to “Clinton must provide empirical evidence to support her ‘Obama can’t win’ claims”